The article analyzes the contradictions of the narrow specialization of scientists, the commonality and contradictions between science and ideology, which serve to legitimize power. The simplified, linear views of politicians as the reasons for the growing conflict of civilizations within the development of European culture are shown. The substitution of science by science in application to social processes is shown. The author criticizes the mechanistic principles of the development of society and science, draws attention to the non-linear nature of modern development and that the apology of determinism in the social Sciences is an erroneous position. Draws attention to the fact that science is essential to observe the principles of natural law and conformity to culture. The contradiction between the bureaucratic formalization of science in Russia and the essence of science in society is analyzed. The problem of using the experience of organization of the national Nuclear project of the USSR in modern Russia is considered, 14 principles of organization are shown in the development and execution of new national projects. The question of the possibility of the deadlock development of science and philosophy in Russia due to the non-critical borrowing of institutions from other cultures, as well as the management of science and the state with not enough critical mutual understanding of their development, the question of the substitution of the essential goals of development by external forms.

Keywords: science, determinism as incorrect position, the unity of nature of science and of authority, the conformity of science, the principles of organization of the national project.